Google’s John Mueller defined what he would think about being a search high quality subject, inflicting rating points particular to Google contemplating the positioning not “high quality.” John mentioned on Twitter “to me, high quality points are issues that customers would think about to be problematic.”
He added that technical points that customers don’t see probably wouldn’t be thought-about a high quality subject by Google. John mentioned, “unhealthy rel-canonical resulting in an alternate URL being listed one thing customers would discover? In all probability not.”
John additionally mentioned it’s common to see each high quality and technical points on the identical web site however that doesn’t imply the 2 are the identical. John wrote, “each technical points & high quality points are extraordinarily large fields, there’s at all times some overlap (eg, is pace a high quality or a technical subject?).” “If a web site has obvious points in one of many two, then tweaking the opposite aspect will not make an enormous impression,” he added.
Listed here are the tweets associated to this, so you possibly can see it in context:
.@johnmu are web optimization technical points high quality points? I’ve seen articles that say you mentioned they have been and that you just mentioned they weren’t lol
Simply attempting to get clarification.
— Kristine Schachinger (@schachin) September 21, 2022
Each technical points & high quality points are extraordinarily large fields, there’s at all times some overlap (eg, is pace a high quality or a technical subject?). If a web site has obvious points in one of many two, then tweaking the opposite aspect will not make an enormous impression.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
It is dependent upon what you think about a high quality subject. To me, high quality points are issues that customers would think about to be problematic. Is a foul rel-canonical resulting in an alternate URL being listed one thing customers would discover? In all probability not.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
And considerably associated however in a unique thread, John wrote “Simply because an internet site is technically legitimate doesn’t suggest it is a helpful & related search end result for customers.”
Simply because an internet site is technically legitimate doesn’t suggest it is a helpful & related search end result for customers.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
So technical points and high quality points are totally different, in accordance with John Mueller of Google.
Discussion board dialogue at Twitter.
