After 12 years of working in – or adjoining to – the advert tech trade, I’m coming to phrases with the straightforward reply to many miserable questions:
- How can made-for-advertising stock thrive now greater than ever?
- Why are vainness metrics nonetheless broadly used to falsely show efficiency?
- Why is there nonetheless such restricted transparency within the advert tech ecosystem?
- Why are web site house owners nonetheless stacking their pages with tech from hundreds of distributors?
- Why are consumers and businesses nonetheless not strictly shopping for on curated and vetted stock solely?
And the record goes on …
The reply to all of those questions: Pecunia non olet.
Wait, it’s all about cash?
This almost 2,000-years-old Latin saying is ascribed to emperor Vespasian and interprets to “cash doesn’t stink.” When Vespasian (re)imposed a tax on the sale of urine from public bogs, his son Titus complained concerning the disgusting nature of this earnings for the treasury. Vespasian felt no disgrace and supposedly held up a gold coin, asking his son whether or not it smelt dangerous. Titus stated no, and Vespasian replied, “But, it comes from urine.”
Lengthy story quick, Vespasian couldn’t care much less concerning the origin of taxes. Cash is cash, and cash is sweet. Curiously, nevertheless, the urine was a helpful materials utilized in tanning and different crafts. We are able to’t say the identical for a lot of problematic points in advert tech, which merely drain worth from the ecosystem.
I take into account giant elements of the advert tech ecosystem to be much like sewers, with a variety of crap passing by them. The explanation for this isn’t associated to any technical complexities, as filters are available and have been for years. But nobody appears prepared to press the button that stops the movement of crap. Why is that?
Cash. It’s all about cash. Capitalism creates perverse incentives for companies and people to look the opposite method if there’s cash to be made.
Self-importance metrics are out of date
Nearly precisely one yr in the past, I wrote concerning the Real Internet. I urged readers to chorus from treating the open net as one large bundle on the danger of penalizing real content material house owners and rewarding nefarious operators. This may be so easy to do, but it looks as if the trade hasn’t progressed – in any respect.
The explanation? There’s some huge cash to be made by trying the opposite method, and, as Vespasian stated, cash doesn’t stink!
Each impression, high-quality or not, is a chance for a lot of events within the ecosystem to earn cash. It’s a zero-sum sport with tons of, if not hundreds, of parasi – sorry, firms – making an attempt to nibble away as a lot of it as attainable for themselves.
Sadly, many of the programs are simply gamed into rewarding stock primarily based on vainness metrics resembling viewability or click-through charges, so a variety of impressions are falsely portrayed as being prime quality.
And this isn’t simply true for open net advert tech; the identical varieties of points are prevalent with operators of walled gardens. Simply take into account the latest Adalytics stories about YouTube. Or when Fb closely inflated video viewership metrics.
Bundling good with dangerous to earn as a lot as attainable whereas not getting caught appears to be the modus operandi for a lot of. With shareholders demanding steady progress, who can blame them? But this sort of bundling carries existential danger for your complete trade, as portrayed brilliantly in an iconic scene in “The Massive Quick.”
Too few folks care concerning the origin of the {dollars} on the underside line in monetary stories, so long as there are extra {dollars} flowing in than the earlier interval.
Pecunia non olet.
“Information-Pushed Considering” is written by members of the media group and incorporates recent concepts on the digital revolution in media.
Observe Ebiquity and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.
