It began with an article about an AI god.
In 2017, an engineer named Anthony Levandowski filed the paperwork for a brand new non-profit known as The Manner of the Future. Levandowski was a widely known determine in tech circles, since he was a self-driving automobile professional.
The agency, which is now defunct, had all of the makings of a faith. On the time, I wrote about how a super-intelligent AI may lead folks to who worship it, bowing down earlier than one thing so highly effective it might management our lives and dictate our future. The brand new firm was simply the most recent and most blatant instance of that.
In reality, The Manner of the Future mission assertion made the purpose fairly clear: “To develop and promote the conclusion of a Godhead based mostly on synthetic intelligence and thru understanding and worship of the Godhead.”
On the time, I wrote about how this kind of AI god might write a bible, create the dictums to comply with, and decide how we must always reside. “It would inform you what to do every day, or the place to journey, or the right way to reside your life,” I wrote. I don’t have entry to the site visitors for the article anymore, however I keep in mind it was one of many website’s most-read thought items that 12 months.
When the article exploded in reputation, tons of of individuals began commenting on social media channels, writing their very own articles, tweeting the hyperlink, and — inevitably — discovering fault with what I had written. A kind of naysayer tweets got here from none aside from Elon Musk. Right here’s the tweet in query:
As you’ll be able to think about, my well-liked opinion piece then went nuclear. I nonetheless obtain emails asking me in regards to the concepts in that piece. It solely takes one tweet for that to occur. (Sadly, the times of tweeting is likely to be over, which implies we’re caught with TikTok as an alternative.)
In fact, Musk wasn’t essential of the article itself, though the tweet might have simply been interpreted that means. As a substitute, he took situation with the idea of somebody creating a strong tremendous intelligence (e.g., an all-knowing entity able to making human-like choices). Within the palms of the improper particular person, an AI might grow to be so highly effective and clever that individuals would begin worshiping it.
One other curious factor? I consider the predictions in that article are about to return true — a super-intelligent AI will emerge and it might result in a brand new faith.
We’re now residing in an age when AI can write whole articles, create images and movies that look hyper-realistic, assist us to program apps and web sites, and imitate our voice and even insert us right into a video. It’s not a stretch to recommend {that a} highly effective AI might seem within the subsequent 10-20 years and that individuals might finally begin worshiping a digital deity.
It’s not time to panic, however it’s time to plan. The true situation is {that a} tremendous clever AI might suppose quicker and extra broadly than any human. AI bots don’t sleep or eat. They don’t have a conscience. They’ll make choices in a fraction of a second earlier than anybody has time to react. Historical past reveals that, when something is that highly effective, folks are likely to worship it. That’s a trigger for concern, much more so as we speak.
It’s laborious to foretell when an AI will emerge that appears so highly effective that anybody would worship it. The loopy factor is that AI could have already reached that time and we don’t even understand it.