Thursday, November 23, 2023
HomeAdvertisingMichael Farmer: will there be a (much-needed) new Madison Avenue Makeover?

Michael Farmer: will there be a (much-needed) new Madison Avenue Makeover?


Guide and creator Michael Farmer is without doubt one of the most incisive and educated commentators on promoting and the broader enterprise atmosphere. His new ebook Madison Avenue Makeover: The Transformation of Large and the Redefinition of the Advert Company Enterprise shall be launched on the Cannes Lions on June 27.

Right here he seems to be at how the enterprise orthodoxy of shareholder worth has affected promoting (and never in a great way.) From C-Suite Blues.

The standard of CEO management has deteriorated, hijacked by short-term “shareholder worth” considerations and corrupted by excessive CEO compensation ranges, that are themselves pushed by short-term earnings and share worth ranges. The deterioration started within the ‘80s and ‘90s, with the rise of deregulation, international competitors, technological modifications and the rise of funding banks and institutional traders who promoted M&A as a method of rising firm share worth ranges. Boards determined to pay very excessive compensation ranges to encourage CEOs “to have some pores and skin within the sport.”

In 2021, a typical CEO at one of many high Fortune 500 companies within the US was paid $27.8 million. This degree is about 350 instances the compensation of a typical employee. Earlier than shareholder worth boiled down company goal to issues of cash and wealth for shareholders, CEO compensation was solely 30-40 instances the compensation of a typical employee.

CEO pay has grown quicker than tuition at non-public universities and schools. CEOs stay a life at present that was inconceivable just a few a long time in the past.

Shareholder worth has made many company executives very wealthy, and this sort of wealth has had a serious affect on the standard of company pondering, priorities and actions. There have been many failures within the market: Kodak, Sears, Nokia, Toys “R” Us, Circuit Metropolis, Yahoo, Borders, GE, Blockbuster, BlackBerry and up to date financial institution failures like Signature Financial institution (CEO pay $8.6 million), Silicon Valley Financial institution ($9.9 million), and First Republic Financial institution ($17.8 million).

Media holding firm CEOs at Publicis Groupe (CEO pay $3.3 million), WPP ($8.4 million), IPG ($13.2 million) and Omnicom ($20 million) have been adept at taking part in the shareholder worth sport, however holding firms are very weak at present. Every of the holding firms generates revenue via “labor-based charges” earned by their subsidiary firms — media companies, inventive companies, manufacturing firms, PR companies, analysis companies, information and evaluation suppliers and the like — firms who obtain “charges per head” from their purchasers for the people who find themselves assigned to work on their accounts.

Shoppers have relentlessly minimize the charges paid over the previous twenty years, however the holding firms have survived and elevated shareholder worth by aggressively downsizing their firms yearly to keep up revenue margins.

This downsizing might need been okay if company workloads have been declining, however fairly on the contrary, workloads have been rising whereas charges have been declining. Downsizing within the title of shareholder worth has liquidated a lot of the expertise within the trade, and companies are actually “underpaid sweatshops” the place company personnel battle to maintain up with the work required by their purchasers. Holding firms have managed to “make their numbers” via this crude and short-sighted method. What they haven’t been capable of do is keep their consumer relationships. Shoppers now flip over each 3 years or so. The company downsizings have definitely had an adversarial impact on company high quality. Shoppers now change companies commonly, looking for decrease charges with each change of company.

The downsizing sport can’t proceed. The holding firm companies are already on shaky floor, even when Wall Road traders and analysts usually are not but conscious of the workload versus staffing versus high quality issues.

What’s going to make issues worse sooner or later, in fact, is AI, which may substitute (by at present’s estimates) as much as 35% of the individuals who make up company headcounts. What’s going to occur to holding firm revenues when purchasers both use AI themselves or drive companies to make use of AI to decrease their headcounts and costs? Will holding firms survive such a dramatic decline in staffing and revenue? If holding firms keep a enterprise mannequin based mostly on “promoting heads for a charge” to their purchasers, they may absolutely get into highly regarded water.

Except holding firms pivot to receives a commission for the work they do quite than being paid for the variety of individuals they allocate to purchasers, they’re positive to enter the rogues gallery of failed firms listed above.

Holding firm CEOs must personally lead transformations all through their portfolio of firms. It will create an uncomfortable state of affairs for these CEOs, since they may now not be capable to give attention to “making the numbers” They must fear concerning the progress of their transformations as nicely.

To this point, in my expertise, solely Large, the modest-sized digital inventive company owned by IPG has gone via such a change, led by Mat Baxter, World CEO. Large’s instance might function a bellwether for different companies — or for the holding firms themselves. (Large’s transformation has been documented in “Madison Avenue Makeover: the Transformation of Large and the Redefinition of the Advert Company Enterprise,” to be revealed in the summertime of 2023).

Shareholder worth is predicated on an phantasm that CEOs can handle certainty and keep away from taking dangers. But, transformations require risk-taking. If there have been any purpose to pay CEOs main quantities of cash, it needs to be due to their successes in taking measured dangers for the longer term quite than counting on the understanding of “making the numbers.”

Let’s see how WPP, Publicis Groupe, Omnicom and IPG play the AI hand within the coming years. AI poses a serious danger for every of those firms. How will they be led? That’s a good query for CEOs Mark Learn, Arthur Sadoun, John Wren and Philippe Krakowsky.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments